پژوهش‌های مرتبط با هستی ‎شناسی در حوزۀ موزه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد علم اطلاعات و دانش ‎شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 استاد علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش ‎شناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر یافتن هستی‎ شناسی‎های مورد استفاده در حوزۀ موزه است. به‌علاوه این پژوهش قصد دارد کاربردهای هستی‎ شناسی در حوزۀ موزه را از طریق بررسی پژوهش‌های صورت گرفته در این حوزه استخراج کند.
روش/رویکرد پژوهش: این پژوهش به شیوۀ مرور نظام‎مند انجام می‎شود و شامل دو بخش اصلی است: بخش اول جستجوی پژوهش‌های مربوط به هستی‌شناسی حوزۀ موزه و بخش دوم تحلیل و بررسی یافته‎ های جستجو را شامل می‌شود.
یافته‌ها و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته ‎های این پژوهش نشان می‎دهد که چندین هستی‌شناسی در حوزۀ موزه وجود دارد که از آن جمله می‌توان به سی‎داک‎ سی‎آرام و ای‎دی‎ام اشاره کرد. در زمینۀ کاربردها نیز مشخص شده که هستی ‎شناسی کاربردهای متعددی در حوزۀ موزه دارد. برای نمونه میانکنش‎پذیری اطلاعات در موزه‎ها، تسهیل دسترسی و بازیابی اطلاعات موزه‎ای. به‎ علاوه نتایج پژوهش نشان از خلأ پژوهشی در حوزۀ هستی‎ شناسی موزه در ایران دارد؛ زیرا تنها دو پژوهش در حوزۀ هستی ‎شناسی میراث فرهنگی به زبان فارسی وجود داشت که مربوط به حوزۀ باستان‎شناسی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Ontology researches in the museum domain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolhosein Farajpahlou 1
  • Farideh Osareh 2
  • Zeynab Farizadeh 3
1 Proffesor, Department ofInformation Science and Konwledge Studies, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Proffesor, Department of Information Science and Konwledge Studies, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 PhD Student of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: This paper intends to find ontologies which are used in the museum domain. In addition, this article aims at extracting ontology applications in the museum domain by studying researches in that domain.
Method and Research Design: The method of this research is the systematic review and contains two major parts: the first part is searching of researches in the museum domain, and the second part contains survey and analysis of research findings.
Findings and Conclusion: The result of this research shows that there are some ontologies in the museum domain. Besides the ontology have several applications in the museum domain. For example, information interoperability in museums, facilitating information access and retrieval. Furthermore, the results indicate that there is a research gap in the ontology for the museum domain in Iran. Because there are only two researches in the ontology in cultural heritage domain in Persian, which are related to the archaeology domain.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Museum ontology
  • cultural heritage
  • ontology application
منابع
کتاب فارسی

آذرگون، مریم؛ فری‌زاده، زینب. (1391). ملزومات کارکردی پیشینه‌های کتاب‌شناختی (اف.آر. بی.آر.) و الگوهای وابسته: فراد و فرساد. (محسن حاجی‌زین‌العابدینی، ویراستار). تهران: چاپار.

مقاله

نوشین‌فرد، فاطمه؛ فضایی قره‌بلاغ، زینب. (1392). «بررسی شیوه‌های سازمان‌دهی، ذخیره و بازیابی اطلاعات در موزه‌های مجازی ایران». فصل‌نامۀ گنجینۀ اسناد، 23(1)، صص 100-115.

نیک‌نیا، معصومه؛ جمالی مهموئی، حمیدرضا؛ علی‌محمدی، داریوش. (1397). «سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات حوزۀ میراث فرهنگی: پیشرفت‌های گذشته و مسائل پیش‌رو». مطالعات کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، 29(3)، صص 61-91.
منابع لاتین
Book chapter
Bruseker, George; Carboni, Nicola; Guillem, Anais. (2017). “Cultural Heritage Data Management: The Role of Formal Ontology and CIDOC CRM”. In book (Matthew, Vincent; Víctor Manuel, López-Menchero Bendicho; Marinos, Ioannides; Thomas, Levy, (eds)), Heritage and archaeology in the digital age: quantitative methods in the humanities and social sciences, pp. 93–131. New York: Springer.
Martini, Ricardo G; Araújo, Cristiana; Almeida, José João; Henriques, Pedro Rangel. (2016). “OntoMP, An Ontology to Build the Museum of the Person”. In book (Álvaro, Rocha; Ana Maria, Correia; Hojjat, Adeli; Luis Paulo, Reis; Marcelo, Mendonça Teixeira, (Eds)), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, vol. 2, pp. 653–661. New York: Springer.
Szekely, Pedro et al. (2013). “Connecting the smithsonian american art museum to the linked data cloud”. In: (P. Cimiano; O. Corcho; V. Presutti; L. Hollink; S. Rudolph, (Eds.)), The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, pp 593–607. New York: Springer.
Article
Ali Al-Mukhtar, Mumtaz M; Abbass Al-Assafy, Ahmed T. (2014). “The implementation of FOAF ontology for an academic social network”. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, 4(1), pp 10–14.
Bright, Tiffani J; Yoko Furuya, E; Kuperman, Gilad J; Cimino, James J; Bakken, Suzanne. (2011). “Development and evaluation of an ontology for guiding appropriate antibiotic prescribing”. Journal of biomedical information, 45(1), pp 120–128.
Concordia, Cesare; Gradmann, Stefan; Siebinga, Sjoerd. (2010). “Not just another portal, not just another digital library: A portrait of Europeana as an application program interface”. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions journal, 36(1), pp 61–69.
Fortier, Alexandre; Menard, Elaine. (2017). “Laying the Ground for DOLMEN: Offering a Simple Standardization Starts with Understanding What Museums Do”. Knowledge Organization, 44(7), pp 485–493.
Fresa, Antonella. (2013). “A data infrastructure for digital cultural heritage: characteristics, requirements and priority services”. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7(supplement), pp 29–46.
Hoaihongthong, Suwannee. (2020). “Cultural Heritage Information Management: A Systematic Review Study”. Journal of Information Science, 38(3), 88–104.
Kim, Hayun; Matuszka, Tamás; Kim, Jea-In; Kim, Jungwha; Woo, Woontack. (2017). “Ontology-based mobile augmented reality in cultural heritage sites: information modeling and user study”. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(24), pp 26001–26029.

Lagoze, Carl; Hunter, Jane. (2001). “The ABC Ontology and Model”. Journal of Digital Information, 2(2), pp 160–176.

Pandolfo, Laura; Spanu, Sara; Pulina, Luca; Grosso, Enrico. (2020). “Understanding and Modeling Visitor Behaviours for Enhancing Personalized Cultural Experiences”. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 16(3), pp 24–38.

Soergel, Dagobert. (1995). “The Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): A Critical Appraisal”. Visual Resources, 10(4), pp 369–400.
Wu, Dan; Wang, Hui-Lin. (2006). “Role of ontology in information retrieval”. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 4(2), pp 148–154.
Conference article

Auer, Sören; Bizer, Christian; Kobilarov, Georgi; Lehmann, Jens; Cyganiak, Richard; Ives, Zachary. (2007). “DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data”. In: 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea November 11-15, 2007. Proceedings. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

Canning, Erin. (2018 September 29 – October 5). “Documenting object experiences in the art museum with CIDOC-CRM”. Paper presented at: CIDOC conference, Crete.
Cherny, Eugene; Haase, Peter; Mouromtsev, Dmitry; Andreev, Alexey; Pavlov, Dmitry. (2015). “Application of CIDOC-CRM for the Russian Heritage Cloud Platform”. In book: (Morzy, Tadeusz. et al. (Eds)), New Trends in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS), (September 8-11, 2015), pp 448–457.
Constantopoulos, Panos; Dallas, Costis; Doerr, Martin; Bekiari, Chryssoula; Dionissiadou, Ifigenia. (2018, September 29 - October 5). “A retrospective on CLIO: legacy, lessons learned and perspectives”. Paper presented at: CIDOC conference, Crete.
Doerr, Martin; Gradmann, Stefan; Hennicke, Steffen; Isaac, Antoine; Meghini, Carlo; Van De Sompel, H. (2010, August 10-15). “The Europeana Data Model (EDM)”. Paper presented at: Word library and information congress: 76th IFLA general conference and assembly, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hajmoosaei, Abdolreza; Skoric, Petra. (2016). “Museum ontology-based metadata” In: IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), February 4-6, pp, 100–103. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.Nafis, Fouad; Yahyaouy, Ali; Aghoutane, Badraddine. (2019, April, 3-5). “Ontologies for the classification of cultural heritage data”. Paper presented at: International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS), MOROCCO.
Ozacar, Tuğba; Ozturk, Ovunc; Salloutah, Lobaba; Yuksel, Fulya; Abdulbaki, Baraa; Bilici Elif. (2017). “A Semantic Web Case Study: Representing the Ephesus Museum Collection Using Erlangen CRM Ontology”. In: (E. Garoufallou, et al). Metadata and semantic research: the 11th International Conference on Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR). Switzerland: Springer.
Tsalapati, Eleni; Simou, Nikolaos; Drosopoulos, Nasos; Stein, Regine. (2012, June 8-9). “Evolving LIDO based aggregations into Linked Data”. Paper presented at: conference CIDOC2012 - Enriching Cultural Heritage, Helsinki, Finland 10-14.6.2012.
University repord
Constantopoulos, Panos. (1994). “Cultural Documentation: The CLIO System”. (Technical Report FORTH-ICS/TR115). Crete: Institute of Computer Science, FORTH.
Noy, Natalya; McGuinness, Deborah. (2001). “Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology”. (Technical report KSL-01-05 and SMI-2001-0880). California: Stanford University.
Internet source
“Compatible models & Collaborations to the CIDOC CRM”. (5/4/2021) from: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/collaborations
CRM Special Interest Group. (2020). “Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model”. (5/4/2021) From: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/CIDOC%20CRM_v.7.0_%2020-6-2020.pdf
Dawson, A; Hillhouse, S. (eds). (2011). “SPECTRUM: The UK Museum Collections Management Standard: SPECTRUM 4.0”. (5/3/2021) from: https://www.obs-traffic.museum/sites/default/files/ressources/files/SPECTRUM_uk_standard.pdf
“DbPedia: global and unified access to knowledge graphs”. (5/4/2021). From: https://www.dbpedia.org
DCMI Usage Board. (2020). “DCMI Metadata Terms”. (5/3/2021) from: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms
“Erlangen CRM/OWL”. (5/3/2021) from: erlangen-crm.org
“Getty Vocabularies”. (5/3/2021) from: https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies
“Introduction to SKOS”. (2012). (5/3/2021). from: https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro
“Iconclass”. (5/4/2021). From: https://rkd.nl/nl/collecties/services-tools/iconclass
ICOM statutes. (2007). “Museum definition”. (5/4/2021) from: https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/museum-definition/
OWL Working Group. (2012). “Web ontology language (OWL)”. (4/7/2021). From: OWL - Semantic Web Standards (w3.org)
Wikipedia. (2021). “Dbpedia”. (5/4/2021). From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBpedia